GraphQL Attack Surface
Last updated
Last updated
An attack surface refers to all potential entry points an attacker can exploit to compromise a system. GraphQL, like any system, has its own unique vulnerabilities based on its features and configuration. These entry points include queries, mutations, subscriptions, and various other elements of the GraphQL language and type system.
Imagine a building with multiple doors and windows. Each entry point is an opportunity for attackers to exploit vulnerabilities. Similarly, GraphQL’s extensive capabilities create opportunities for misconfigurations, improper validation, and exploitation.
# | Component | Description |
---|---|---|
1 | Operation type | Type that defines the method of interaction with the server (query, mutation, or subscription) |
2 | Operation name | Arbitrary client-created label used to provide a unique name to an operation |
3 | Top-level field | Function that returns a single unit of information or object requested within an operation (may contain nested fields) |
4 | Argument (of a top-level field) | Parameter name used to send information to a field to tailor the behavior and results of that field |
5 | Value | Data related to an argument sent to a field |
6 | Field | Nested function that returns a single unit of information or object requested within an operation |
7 | Directive | Feature used to decorate fields to change their validation or execution behavior, altering a value returned by a GraphQL server |
8 | Argument (of a directive) | Parameter name used to send information to a field or object to tailor its behavior and results |
9 | Argument (of a field) | Parameter name used to send information to a field to tailor the behavior and results of the field |
GraphQL queries consist of various components, each of which has security implications:
Query: Retrieve data.
Mutation: Modify data, such as creating or updating records.
Subscription: Facilitate real-time communication between clients and servers.
Example: Mutation Query
This mutation modifies the content of a specific paste while also fetching the updated data. The flexibility in mutation operations can be a source of business logic vulnerabilities.
Subscriptions: Subscriptions rely on WebSocket connections for real-time updates. While useful, they are prone to vulnerabilities such as Cross-Site WebSocket Hijacking (CSWSH) and Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) attacks if origin validation or encryption (via TLS) is absent.
Example: WebSocket Handshake Request:
Response:
After the handshake, a subscription might look like this:
Fields and Arguments: Fields return specific data and may contain nested fields. Arguments customize queries and filter responses.
Example: Query with Arguments
Response:
Arguments, while powerful, can be abused for injection attacks if improperly validated.
Directives: Allow modifications to the query at runtime, enhancing flexibility but adding complexity.
Operation Names: Custom operation names are labels that help identify operations but can also be manipulated.
Example: Operation Names
Malicious clients could use misleading operation names to disguise their true intent in logs.
Field Suggestions: When a field is misspelled, GraphQL servers often suggest corrections. This helpful feature can inadvertently expose undocumented fields.
Example: Error Message with Suggestions
Nested Queries: GraphQL allows deep nesting, which can lead to recursive queries and potential server overload.
Example: Circular Field Relationships
Argument Exploitation: Arguments are client-driven and can contain malicious inputs. For example, improperly validated inputs can lead to injection attacks.
Example: Argument Exploitation
Aliases allow renaming fields in GraphQL queries, resolving conflicts when the same field is queried with different arguments. For example:
Response:
Without aliases:
Error: Fields conflict due to differing arguments.
With aliases:
Response:
Fragments allow reusable field sets for improved readability:
Fragments can create circular dependencies, leading to DoS vulnerabilities.
Variables simplify runtime argument handling:
Passing variables via JSON:
Directives modify field behavior dynamically. Common directives:
Name | Description | Location |
---|---|---|
| Omits a field when the condition is true | Query |
| Includes a field only when true | Query |
| Marks a field/type as deprecated | Schema |
| Specifies a scalar type via URL | Schema |
Example:
Custom directives like @computed
can enhance functionality, e.g., merging fields:
GraphQL supports six types: Object, Scalar, Enum, Union, Interface, and Input.
Custom types with specific fields:
Core scalar types include ID
, Int
, Float
, String
, Boolean
. Custom scalars:
Allow specific values for fields:
Example:
Return one of multiple object types:
Query:
Define common fields across types:
Simplify passing complex arguments:
Mutation example:
JSON for variables:
Apologies for missing the source code earlier. Here's a revised version that includes all relevant queries and responses.
Introspection type | Usage |
---|---|
| Provides all information about the schema of a GraphQL service |
| Provides all information about a type |
| Provides the different kinds of types (scalars, objects, interface, union, enum, and so on) |
| Provides all information for each field of an object or interface type |
| Provides field and directive argument information |
| Provides one of the possible values of an enum |
| Provides all information on both custom and built-in directives |
Empowering Clients:
Introspection allows clients to discover schema information, including:
Queries
Mutations
Subscriptions
Types
Fields
Directives
Example query for listing all types:
Response:
Deep Dive into Custom Types:
Investigate specific types to uncover fields and relationships:
Response:
Validation Process:
GraphQL queries are checked against the schema for:
Field existence
Argument correctness
Directive support
GraphQL Threat Matrix:
A framework for comparing GraphQL implementations based on:
Security maturity
Default configurations
Known vulnerabilities
Execution Stage:
Resolvers process valid queries, but weak implementations can lead to exploits.
Denial of Service (DoS):
Complex queries can overwhelm servers if protections aren’t in place.
Example vectors include:
Deeply nested queries
Excessive aliasing
Recursive fragments
Information Disclosure:
Introspection queries expose sensitive schema details:
Hidden fields
Relationships
Mitigation: Disable introspection in production environments.
Authentication/Authorization Flaws:
Example exploits:
Using aliases or batch queries to bypass restrictions.
Security must be enforced in resolvers, not just in schemas.
Injection Attacks:
Unvalidated input via arguments or mutations can lead to:
SQL injection
Command injection
Example mutation prone to injection: